- From: Kostiainen, Anssi <anssi.kostiainen@intel.com>
- Date: Wed, 2 Oct 2013 12:44:14 +0000
- To: "public-sysapps@w3.org" <public-sysapps@w3.org>, Marcos Caceres <w3c@marcosc.com>
- CC: "Nilsson, Claes1" <Claes1.Nilsson@sonymobile.com>, "Kenneth Rohde Christiansen" <kenneth.christiansen@gmail.com>, Dave Raggett <dsr@w3.org>, "Isberg, Anders" <Anders.Isberg@sonymobile.com>
On Sep 25, 2013, at 1:48 PM, Marcos Caceres <w3c@marcosc.com> wrote: [...] > This means that, from the get-go, certified and privileged packaged apps cannot be shared across runtimes in an interoperable manner (without replacing the signature, which kinda defeats the purpose). > > Question for the SysApps WG is: do we want to attempt to standardise a digital signature scheme for packaged apps? A follow up question to the group, assuming digsig is scoped out: What is the problem the group would like to solve by standardizing "unsigned" packaged apps that is not solved by "hosted apps" (for the sake of a better word) and ServiceWorkers (that will hopefully address the offline problem)? It seems the runtime-related bits on which to reach consensus on are: * App Manifest * App Lifecycle and Events * ServiceWorkers Thanks, -Anssi
Received on Wednesday, 2 October 2013 12:45:26 UTC