- From: Wonsuk Lee <wonsuk11.lee@samsung.com>
- Date: Fri, 01 Nov 2013 13:36:50 +0900
- To: 'Marcos Caceres' <w3c@marcosc.com>
- Cc: public-sysapps@w3.org, 'Mounir Lamouri' <mounir@lamouri.fr>
Marcos. Thanks for quick reply! > -----Original Message----- > From: Marcos Caceres [mailto:w3c@marcosc.com] > Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2013 2:00 AM > To: Wonsuk Lee > Cc: public-sysapps@w3.org; Mounir Lamouri > Subject: Re: Tracing action items from previous F2F meeting > > > > > On Tuesday, October 29, 2013 at 6:15 AM, Wonsuk Lee wrote: > > > Hi. active members! > > From Toronto F2F meeting, we have more than 10 action items as below. So > I would like to know about current status of them. I hope if possible we > have done this before upcoming F2F. > > > > -- Action items from the meeting, 27th Aug. > > > > From Action01 to Action03 belong to Marcos. > > > > Action01: file a bug about maybe relaxing dependency on sniff [recorded > in http://www.w3.org/2013/08/27-sysapps-minutes.html#action01] > > Done. See: > https://github.com/sysapps/app- > uri/commit/3f180e9439bd1631b78ce66113e904bcaa9daffb > > > Action02: make it clearer that uuid is not a hard requirement [recorded > in http://www.w3.org/2013/08/27-sysapps-minutes.html#action02] > > > The spec already states that: > > “It is recommended that a [UUID] be used as the value of the authority > component (but it's not mandatory! Other types of authorities, like > reverse domain name notation, are allowed). Using a [UUID] makes it > improbable that two URIs will be alike, and also makes them hard to guess. > " Looks good to me. Thanks! Kr Wonsuk.
Received on Friday, 1 November 2013 04:37:21 UTC