- From: EDUARDO FULLEA CARRERA <efc@tid.es>
- Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2013 17:29:58 +0000
- To: "public-sysapps@w3.org" <public-sysapps@w3.org>
- Cc: "Kis, Zoltan" <zoltan.kis@intel.com>
Hi, There are two different trends followed by the two Telephony API proposals on the table regarding call states and transitions. In a nutshell the basic difference is whether: -we specify a call state machine that allows the telephony applications to be confident on the state transitions that may be expected at every point in the call flow (as in [1] section 8.2), or otherwise -we define a state transition matrix (as in [2] section 4.4) which describes a lax transition policy between call states and require the telephony applications to re-synchronize its internal state according to the call transitions reported by the telephony network The authors of these proposals are interested in getting fresh arguments from other members of the group on the two approaches. [1] http://sysapps.github.com/sysapps/proposals/Telephony/Telephony.html [2] http://sysapps.github.com/sysapps/proposals/Telephony_Intel/Telephony.html ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra política de envío y recepción de correo electrónico en el enlace situado más abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx
Received on Tuesday, 22 January 2013 17:30:26 UTC