- From: Wonsuk Lee <wonsuk11.lee@samsung.com>
- Date: Wed, 02 Jan 2013 13:29:34 +0900
- To: 'Jonas Sicking' <jonas@sicking.cc>, 'Wonsuk Lee' <wonsuk73@gmail.com>
- Cc: 'Mounir Lamouri' <mounir@lamouri.fr>, public-sysapps@w3.org
Jonas. > -----Original Message----- > From: Jonas Sicking [mailto:jonas@sicking.cc] > Sent: Monday, December 31, 2012 4:42 PM > To: Wonsuk Lee > Cc: Mounir Lamouri; public-sysapps@w3.org > Subject: Re: Runtime and Security Model for Web Applications > > On Fri, Dec 28, 2012 at 10:37 PM, Wonsuk Lee <wonsuk73@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi. Mounir. > > Thanks a lot for your proposal! > > > > I have a basic question. In web applications WG, you are developing > > the Web Application Manifest Format and Management APIs[1] spec as an > > editor. I think some part of the proposal is duplicated with the spec > of web apps WG. > > > > So I would like to get your opinions about relationship between both > > docs in the aspect of spec development in W3C. > > The intent is that the two documents will be one and the same. > > There was a lot of uncertainty if the WebApps WG was actually interested > in taking up this deliverable. Last time we an earlier and less complete > draft of the spec, we did not get enough interest to get it published as a > FPWD. But if the WebApps working group is happy to publish it once it's > more comprehensive, then that would be great. I think we need to know a clear position of WebApps WG. > But until the WebApps WG indicates that they are interested in publishing > it as well, we're planning on working on it in the SysApps WG. I am not sure but I guess we could have additional two options. Option 1 is to create a task force with WebApps WG to handle this and option 2 is to take it over in this group as a part of execution and security model. What do you think? @Dave, could you have a comment for this? Best regards, Wonsuk. > > / Jonas
Received on Wednesday, 2 January 2013 04:30:06 UTC