- From: Wonsuk Lee <wonsuk73@gmail.com>
- Date: Sun, 28 Apr 2013 20:21:56 +0900
- To: "Nilsson, Claes1" <Claes1.Nilsson@sonymobile.com>
- Cc: "public-sysapps@w3.org" <public-sysapps@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAKmBCi0yLKyrYK6EYSy8jdNtw_FhdE=BsONj2p5TJ0ThOeOhdw@mail.gmail.com>
Hi. Claes. Thanks a lot for updated spec! It seems it's time to bring this to FPWD. What do you think? Kr, Wonsuk. 2013. 4. 26. ¿ÀÀü 6:49¿¡ "Nilsson, Claes1" <Claes1.Nilsson@sonymobile.com>´ÔÀÌ ÀÛ¼º: > Hi all,**** > > ** ** > > I have uploaded a new version of the socket API to the repository at > Github: http://raw-sockets.sysapps.org/**** > > ** ** > > Ke-Fong, Jonas, Marcos and Christophe have provided valuable feedback > (thanks!) and compared to the previous version the following has been done: > **** > > ** ** > > ** *Changed all fields in UDPOptions dictionary be not nullable**** > > * For UDPSocket added separate readonly attributes that correspond to the > fields in the UDPOptions dictionary instead of having one attribute of type > UDPOptions (which is illegal WebIDL-syntax)**** > > * For UDP and TCP Socket changed to just one send() method taking > DOMString or Blob or ArrayBuffer or ArrayBufferView as type for the first > argument , data.**** > > * Changed all fields in TCPOptions dictionary be not nullable and removed > remoteAddress and remotePort.**** > > * Added remoteAddress and remotePort as explicit arguments to the > TCPSocket constructor and changed options to be an optional argument.**** > > * For TCPSocket added readonly attributes for remoteAddress/Port and > localAddress/Port and removed the attribute of type UDPOptions (which is > illegal WebIDL-syntax).**** > > * Fixed TCPServerSocket accordingly.**** > > * Edits so that the plain html source code is more readable, e.g. shorted > line lengths.**** > > **** > > The following remains to be done:**** > > ** ** > > - More work on support for secure sockets**** > > - Resolution on binding to local interface according to Jonas comment**** > > - Resolution on whether joining multicast group for UDP sockets should be > done through separate method or through constructor according to Jonas > comment.**** > > ** ** > > For details see issues at > https://github.com/sysapps/raw-sockets/issues?page=1&state=open**** > > ** ** > > Best regards**** > > Claes**** > > ** ** > > ** ** > > *Claes Nilsson M.Sc.E.E** ***** > > Master Engineer - Web Research **** > > Advanced Application Labs**** > > **** > > Sony Mobile Communications**** > > Tel: +46 705 56 68 78**** > > sonymobile.com**** > > **** > > [image: SONY make.believe]**** > > ** ** >
Attachments
- image/jpeg attachment: image001.jpg
Received on Sunday, 28 April 2013 11:22:23 UTC