- From: Dave Raggett <dsr@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2013 10:43:50 +0100
- To: "public-sysapps@w3.org" <public-sysapps@w3.org>
This to bring an issue [1] to the full SysApps WG mailing list.
The SysApps and WebApps working groups both have an interest in
standardizing a JSON based manifest format for apps.
The requirements for manifests for packaged and hosted apps overlap
significantly, and presumably app developers would like to minimise
differences in the manifest formats for packaged and hosted apps.
This has been discussed at the recent SysApps Face to Face meeting [2],
and separately by WebApps [3].
Here are some possibilities:
a. one of the two groups takes full ownership of the
manifest format for both packaged and hosted apps
b. one group standardizes the manifest format and the
other group standardizes extensions to that format
as necessary for their own use cases
c. there is a joint task force involving both groups
that standardizes a single specification covering
the use cases for both working groups
Whichever approach is adopted, both groups will need to liaise
carefully. If we go the Task Force route, we would have a new mailing
list and an area on the wiki. That is trivial to set up.
At the SysApps face to face we resolved to propose to create a TF to the
WebApps F2F for the runtime work. However, following the recent
discussion in WebApps WG, it seems that WebApps WG is willing to take on
full ownership and to drive the spec to W3C Recommendation for both
packaged and hosted apps. Presumably, this includes covering any SysApps
requirements in relation to the security and runtime model.
We now need to take a decision on how to move forward.
[1] https://github.com/sysapps/manifest/issues/20#issuecomment-17037665
[2] http://www.w3.org/2013/04/11-sysapps-minutes.html#item07
[3] http://www.w3.org/2013/04/25-webapps-minutes.html#action10
--
Dave Raggett <dsr@w3.org> http://www.w3.org/People/Raggett
Received on Friday, 26 April 2013 09:44:20 UTC