- From: Dave Raggett <dsr@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2013 10:43:50 +0100
- To: "public-sysapps@w3.org" <public-sysapps@w3.org>
This to bring an issue [1] to the full SysApps WG mailing list. The SysApps and WebApps working groups both have an interest in standardizing a JSON based manifest format for apps. The requirements for manifests for packaged and hosted apps overlap significantly, and presumably app developers would like to minimise differences in the manifest formats for packaged and hosted apps. This has been discussed at the recent SysApps Face to Face meeting [2], and separately by WebApps [3]. Here are some possibilities: a. one of the two groups takes full ownership of the manifest format for both packaged and hosted apps b. one group standardizes the manifest format and the other group standardizes extensions to that format as necessary for their own use cases c. there is a joint task force involving both groups that standardizes a single specification covering the use cases for both working groups Whichever approach is adopted, both groups will need to liaise carefully. If we go the Task Force route, we would have a new mailing list and an area on the wiki. That is trivial to set up. At the SysApps face to face we resolved to propose to create a TF to the WebApps F2F for the runtime work. However, following the recent discussion in WebApps WG, it seems that WebApps WG is willing to take on full ownership and to drive the spec to W3C Recommendation for both packaged and hosted apps. Presumably, this includes covering any SysApps requirements in relation to the security and runtime model. We now need to take a decision on how to move forward. [1] https://github.com/sysapps/manifest/issues/20#issuecomment-17037665 [2] http://www.w3.org/2013/04/11-sysapps-minutes.html#item07 [3] http://www.w3.org/2013/04/25-webapps-minutes.html#action10 -- Dave Raggett <dsr@w3.org> http://www.w3.org/People/Raggett
Received on Friday, 26 April 2013 09:44:20 UTC