- From: Ming Jin <ming.jin.web@gmail.com>
- Date: Sat, 20 Apr 2013 18:53:49 +0900
- To: Marcos Caceres <w3c@marcosc.com>
- Cc: "public-sysapps@w3.org" <public-sysapps@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAHNuU=tp-ZTW9Zzw4=BNit9c_ohjJezTimkky3bYnUx2GzXChw@mail.gmail.com>
+1 I believe this will accelerate the manifest spec progress, and hope it can also create an opportunity for wider group of people (e.g., WebApps WG) to pay attention :) Cheers, Ming Jin 2013³â 4¿ù 20ÀÏ Åä¿äÀÏ¿¡ Marcos Caceres´ÔÀÌ ÀÛ¼º: > Hi All, > The repo for the manifest is now at the link below. Please subscribe > yourself if you want to be a reviewer: > https://github.com/sysapps/manifest > > > On the Webs, you can access the manifest at: > http://manifest.sysapps.org/ > > (Please note that the spec sections will be getting some reshuffles over > the next week ¡¦ it's a bit of a mess ATM, but hope to get it under control > soon. Pull requests, questions, bugs, etc. all welcomed!) > > Kind regards, > Marcos > > -- > Marcos Caceres > > > On Thursday, April 18, 2013 at 12:15 PM, Marcos Caceres wrote: > > > For those not tracking GH, we recently merged in a draft rewrite of the > manifest format (see section 3): > > http://runtime.sysapps.org/#application-manifest-and-its-members > > > > It now defines some of the processing rules + i18n model. > > > > We currently have a proposal in GH to split the application manifest > from the runtime spec [1] (IIRC, we also discussed this briefly during the > F2F). > > > > Are there any objections to splitting the manifest format into its own > specification? Words of support would > > be appreciated. > > > > [1] https://github.com/sysapps/runtime/issues/76 > > > > -- > > Marcos Caceres > > > > >
Received on Saturday, 20 April 2013 09:54:16 UTC