- From: Dave Raggett <dsr@w3.org>
- Date: Sat, 26 May 2012 11:12:40 +0100
- To: public-sysapps@w3.org
On 26/05/12 00:07, Carr, Wayne wrote: > I wasn't suggesting different APIs. I meant the APIs to be developed in this WG. Just to keep in mind when creating APIs that some parts of them may be useful in the browser context if there is a trust relationship, so modularize them so that part can be adopted if they want to adopt it. That particularly applies to system information APIs that are excluded from DAP (and in this group) only due to fingerprinting concerns. As Bryan suggested, this something that can be considered in the planned work on the security context. Do you think the current wording in the charter is adequate, or should we add a sentence or two to make the idea explicit? -- Dave Raggett <dsr@w3.org> http://www.w3.org/People/Raggett
Received on Saturday, 26 May 2012 10:13:05 UTC