- From: Glenn Adams <glenn@skynav.com>
- Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2012 14:43:07 -0600
- To: "Carr, Wayne" <wayne.carr@intel.com>
- Cc: W3C SysApps <public-sysapps@w3.org>
Received on Tuesday, 5 June 2012 20:44:00 UTC
On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 2:37 PM, Carr, Wayne <wayne.carr@intel.com> wrote: > > Is it possible to word the draft so that it is possible to add new > work on yet to be named APIs without rechartering? For example, under > phase 2:**** > > > "Other APIs that adhere to the Goals and the Scope of the charter and > which do not directly conflict with the chartered deliverables of another > Working Group."**** > > ** ** > > Lawyers wouldn’t be too happy about that when trying to figure out scope > of possible licensing commitments. That would be anything is in scope > that isn’t being done elsewhere. > no, since the above language scopes "Other APIs" to Goals/Scope and non-conflict; in any case, since we aren't lawyers, perhaps we shouldn't presuppose their reaction (if any)?
Received on Tuesday, 5 June 2012 20:44:00 UTC