- From: Jungkee Song <jungkee.song@samsung.com>
- Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2012 20:40:21 +0900
- To: 'Jonas Sicking' <jonas@sicking.cc>
- Cc: 'Mounir Lamouri' <mounir@lamouri.fr>, public-sysapps@w3.org
> -----Original Message----- > From: Jonas Sicking [mailto:jonas@sicking.cc] > Sent: Monday, June 04, 2012 1:44 PM > To: Jungkee Song > Cc: Mounir Lamouri; public-sysapps@w3.org > Subject: Re: Deliverables > > On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 5:10 AM, Jungkee Song <jungkee.song@samsung.com> > wrote: > >> From: Mounir Lamouri [mailto:mounir@lamouri.fr] > >> Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2012 5:50 PM > >> To: public-sysapps@w3.org > >> Subject: Re: Deliverables > >> > >> On 05/30/2012 04:36 AM, Jungkee Song wrote: > >> > Hi, > >> > > >> > For the first round, I would like to count the following APIs, too: > >> > - Application > >> > - Media Storage > >> > - Bluetooth > >> > >> As Adam said, Media Storage is a bit too controversial to be in the > >> first set. Also, regarding the Bluetooth API, it doesn't seem like a > >> priority to me. > > > > Although Media Storage is a controversial topic, we won't avoid the > effort > > to hammer out consensus anyway. I think this is a right place to talk. > > Why don't we start trying? > > I'd be ok with trying to do this API (I think it's a very interesting > API since it provides a missing piece for a large number of types of > applications). However I will say that I don't think it will be a > small task to reach consensus on this API given how different the > Mozilla/Google/Tizen proposals are. Indeed, it is an important piece we should work on as you mentioned. I believe none of the proposals from Mozilla/Google/Tizen can be a best candidate itself. Let's discuss in the group when the things are set up. ;) Regards, Jungkee
Received on Monday, 4 June 2012 11:40:20 UTC