W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-sws-ig@w3.org > March 2006

Re: WSDL-S and the new WG

From: Carine Bournez <carine@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2006 13:40:12 +0100
To: Bijan Parsia <bparsia@isr.umd.edu>
Cc: SWS-IG <public-sws-ig@w3.org>
Message-ID: <20060321124012.GD7222@ender.inria.fr>

On Tue, Mar 21, 2006 at 06:59:30AM -0500, Bijan Parsia wrote:
> Also, while profiles in OWL-S are only OWL, preconditions and effects 
> are parameterizable, as are input and output type (though they must be 
> URI identified).
> 
> Ok, that's just a bit of nitpicking...though it did jump out at me :)
> 
> The real question is that WSDL-S, the current version, *does* define 
> precondition and effect (for example) elements (to be children of 
> operation elements). Are these ruled out of scope?

yes, they are out of scope (per the SAWSDL WG charter)
they will be in scope of other discussions in other groups at some point.

> (There are many many issues even when you agree on the langauges for 
> expressing them, e.g., where they are to be evaluated. (Which might not 
> be hard or could be very hard, depending.)
> 
> Actually, WSDL-S seems to include hooks for most of the OWL-S profile, 
> with reference to OWL-S....er...isn't this supposed to be 
> controversial? What am I missing?

Why would it be controversial?
Received on Tuesday, 21 March 2006 12:40:35 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:32:52 UTC