- From: Drew McDermott <drew.mcdermott@yale.edu>
- Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2006 23:20:13 -0500
- To: public-sws-ig@w3.org
> [Shi, Xuan] > ... I know I said something different from the others. Such as what is > service composition? My definition is different from the so-called > "standard" meaning, but I think it is more realistic and understandable for > all users who are not programmers and AI professionals to consume Web > services. This admission is simply astonishing. I pointed this discrepancy out to Xuan months ago in private correspondence. The SW community disagrees about many aspects of the "service composition problem," but everyone agrees it involves computers doing some sort of combination of solutions of small web-service problems in order to solve bigger problems. Because the English word "compose" is ambiguous, and because Xuan came into this area as an outsider, he originally thought it meant human composition of web-service requests (as one would compose an SQL request, for instance). An honest misunderstanding. But it is not an acceptable response to such a revelation to continue to use the semi-standard term in one's nonstandard way. To do so is to guarantee that any discussion using the term will be meaningless, chaotic, and ultimately acrimonious. (The more so if there are _other_ terms that are being used in nonstandard ways; who knows?) I don't see why anyone would pursue this any further. -- -- Drew McDermott Yale University Computer Science Department
Received on Friday, 17 March 2006 04:17:08 UTC