- From: Jan Ortmann <j.ort@web.de>
- Date: Thu, 8 Jun 2006 23:35:55 +0200
- To: <public-sws-ig@w3.org>
Dear all, I would like to start a discussion about what kind of information pre- and postconditions need to provide. Since the approach followed by OWL-S and WSMO is to use an axiomatic semantics we should provide a set of Hoare-triples {P}p{Q} for each process. Preconditions "declare" the variables and provide conditions to call the process. But what are the effects? Here, I suppose, we should model all things that a process changes. For a process, where I buy something, this usually includes the balance of my account as well as the fact, that something will be delivered. Thus we need be able to express, that things change, although we did not pass them in as a parameter (my account), and we need a concept of time (since things will be delivered in the future). I would think that we might have a precondition {Creditcard(X) /\ X.account.balance>200 /\ Book(Y) /\ Buyer(Z)} where the value of functional roles (attributes) was written as in OO languages by a dot. An effect might look like {[X.account.balance]after = [X.account.balance]before - 200 /\ [Y.owner]after=Z} Here I indicated the states by "[*]after" and "[*]before". Are there any publications on these issues or any further suggestions? Regards, Jan Ortmann
Received on Thursday, 8 June 2006 21:38:39 UTC