- From: Xuan Shi <Xuan.Shi@mail.wvu.edu>
- Date: Tue, 01 Aug 2006 09:19:52 -0400
- To: <carine@w3.org>
- Cc: <public-sws-ig@w3.org>
Carine, W3C said @ http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/NOTE-ws-gloss-20040211/ "Web service There are many things that might be called "Web services" in the world at large. However, for the purpose of this Working Group and this architecture, and without prejudice toward other definitions, we will use the following definition: A Web service is a software system designed to support interoperable machine-to-machine interaction over a network. It has an interface described in a machine-processable format (specifically WSDL). Other systems interact with the Web service in a manner prescribed by its description using SOAP-messages, typically conveyed using HTTP with an XML serialization in conjunction with other Web-related standards." As for "WSDL-based service", I just want to STRESS on W3C terminology of "Web services" - they should _specifically_ have a WSDL interface, other than Web interface, you see W3C already emphasized such limitation in 2004 - "There are many things that might be called "Web services" in the world at large.", like OWL-S people - they are talking about *Web sites*, not WSDL. I hope OWL-S people can give us a definite explanation why they do not follow W3C specification but keep changing and transforming the concepts. Regards, Xuan >>> Carine Bournez <carine@w3.org> 08/01/06 4:35 AM >>> On Tue, Aug 01, 2006 at 12:08:03AM -0400, Xuan Shi wrote: > > If W3C and this SWS-IG try to define service semantics for WSDL-based > service, other than Web-site based service, people have to re-examine > the suitability of OWL-S for SWS because OWL-S targets at a wrong object > (Web site) other than Web service defined by W3C. Now stop that FUD. This Interest Group is not trying to define semantics for "WSDL-based service". The term "WSDL-based" is a complete non-sense and you misread (once again) the definition of the WS Arch Note. Opposing "WSDL-based" and "web-based" is of course as non-sensical as opposing REST and WSDL. Of course I will not answer any of your questions, the troll is over (at least for me, it's up to other contributors to decide if they want to lose their time). -- Carine Bournez -+- W3C Europe
Received on Tuesday, 1 August 2006 13:20:32 UTC