- From: Bijan Parsia <bparsia@isr.umd.edu>
- Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2006 11:56:56 -0400
- To: "Daniela CLARO" <Daniela.CLARO@eseo.fr>
- Cc: <public-sws-ig@w3.org>
On Apr 12, 2006, at 4:03 AM, Daniela CLARO wrote: > > Hi all, > I want to hear from you about composition types. Actually, I > classified > the composition of sws in two categories: static compositions and > dynamic compositions. > From static composition I mean the compositions that know iin advance > all services that will belong to the composition, for example, the use > of workflows, that we decide before which services will participate to > the compostion. Do you have other examples from static compositions? I tend to call this a fully grounded composition. That is, a workflow where all the service invocations are bound to particular concrete services. I don't think this is *static* because it's pretty easy to imagine replacing one of the concrete services with an equivalent on at execution time (say, due to the unavailability of the original service). That is, a system with a robust recovery (or aggressive optimizing) function could treat the grounded composition rather dynamically. > About dynamic composition, it is the use of dynamic workflow, the use > of > planning to compose, Does it have to be planning? What about my replacement with equivalents above? (Or better, imagine something roughly equivalent to dynamic dispatch...I don't change the *workflow*, but I resolve the endpoint at run time. Is this really planning?) > the use of graphs. I mean that we don't know in > advance which services will participate to the composition. But that's true in the above case, at least in principle. Also, in advance of *what*. The main point of a planning system is to decide what operators to use (in what order) *before* execution (i.e., off line). So, in a sense, after planning we DO know which services (we intend) to execute (in advance of execution). What about contingent planning? E.g., if I have a conditional in my plan that's sensitive to some run time sensing. I can't say, in advance, which path will be taken, so I don't know what services will actually be executed. Contrariwise, if my planning domain has only a fixed set of operators (and I'm not allowed to change them), then I know what services could possibly be executed. > Moreover, if > I have a service s1 that need another service s2 in order to be > executed, so the dynamic composition should find this other service s2 > and put s2 in the composition. Isn't that? Do you have other examples > of > dynamic compositions? I'm not sure what purpose this distinction is to serve. So it's hard to figure out what falls on which side of the divide. > So I want to hear from you what do you think about this classification > and examples of static and dynamic compositions. See above :) Cheers, Bijan.
Received on Wednesday, 12 April 2006 15:57:24 UTC