Is there any restriction to the relation between simple process and atomic process (or composite process) ? Should it be one-to-one or one-to-many ? Can a simple process realized by a process collection composed of atomic processes and composite processes? If a simple process SP_A is realized by an atomic process AP_B, should SP_A's IOPR be the subset of AP_B's IOPR or exactly equal to AP_B's IOPR? -- Best regards! Manshan Lin (ÁÖÂúɽ) Email: lmshill@gmail.com ; lmshill@hotmail.com Affiliation: School of Computer Science and Engineering, the South China University of Technology Mobile: (+86)13711287277 2005-09-06 ---------------------- For want of a nail The shoe was lost, For want of a shoe The horse was lost, For want of a horse The rider was lost, For want of a rider The battle was lost, For want of a battle The kingdom was lost, And all for the want Of a horse shoe nail. Never neglect details! ---------------------- \ " ___0__/ | /_ | .__/ \_. |
Received on Tuesday, 6 September 2005 08:57:05 UTC