- From: Drew McDermott <drew.mcdermott@yale.edu>
- Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2005 14:53:09 -0500
- To: public-sws-ig@w3.org
> [Shi, Xuan] > However, if service semantics is developed based on standards and > agreements, then everything is clear and we do not need logic for > matchmaking. Well, yes, but that takes all the fun out of it. You seem to be saying that human developers, given enough clear information about web services, can write any desired program for interacting with web services. That's certainly true. The more interesting question (to me, anyway) is whether there is a point in "generality space" where it pays people to describe web services formally enough that automated agents can write the programs, or at least play a role in writing them. The descriptions would have to be written without detailed knowledge of what program was going to be required, which seems to indicate that the notation should be neutral and general-purpose. Such notations tend to look like logic of some kind. Of course, the answer to the "interesting question" may well be No. -- Drew -- -- Drew McDermott Yale University Computer Science Department
Received on Tuesday, 22 November 2005 19:52:19 UTC