- From: Drew McDermott <drew.mcdermott@yale.edu>
- Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2005 10:52:47 -0500
- To: public-sws-ig@w3.org
- CC: drew.mcdermott@yale.edu
> [jeff@inf.ed.ac.uk] > > BTW, why is it said that "the current WSDL standard operates at the > syntactic level"? What is any more semantic about the things that > are labelled "semantic"? By old and well established usage, "semantic" means "complex, expressive, insightful, ours," contrasted with "syntactic," which means "simple, weak, error-prone, theirs." It would be nice to avoid this term completely, but then we'd have to change the name "Semantic Web." -- Drew
Received on Monday, 21 November 2005 15:51:41 UTC