- From: Daniel Elenius <elenius@csl.sri.com>
- Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2005 09:27:42 -0700
- To: Bijan Parsia <bparsia@isr.umd.edu>, public-sws-ig@w3.org
> > My point was that I don't view the SWRL syntax as being as worthy of > following to the letter, since it's just a note. There's more fluidity. > Although it's not officially a standard (or "W3C Recommendation"), a fair number of people already seem to be using it, creating tool support for it, etc. It may be that the need for something like SWRL was so great that people don't care if it's officially a "standard" or not. Lots of things become de-facto standards before they become official standards (if ever). Having said that, it's obviously more important to conform to OWL (DL). I was hoping we could do both. Daniel
Received on Thursday, 23 June 2005 16:27:49 UTC