Re: Small problem with Expression.owl

>
> My point was that I don't view the SWRL syntax as being as worthy of 
> following to the letter, since it's just a note. There's more fluidity.
>

Although it's not officially a standard (or "W3C Recommendation"), a 
fair number of people already seem to be using it, creating tool support 
for it, etc. It may be that the need for something like SWRL was so 
great that people don't care if it's officially a "standard" or not. 
Lots of things become de-facto standards before they become official 
standards (if ever).

Having said that, it's obviously more important to conform to OWL (DL). 
I was hoping we could do both.

Daniel

Received on Thursday, 23 June 2005 16:27:49 UTC