- From: Jyotishman Pathak <jyotishman@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2005 09:58:05 -0600
- To: "Public-Sws-Ig@W3. Org" <public-sws-ig@w3.org>, owlseditor-discussion@projects.semwebcentral.org, owl-s@lists.mindswap.org
- Cc: jyotishman@gmail.com
Hi, I am a beginner with the SWS technologies and have been doing some reading about the service discovery mechanims, mostly focussing on the OWL-s approach. What I can decipher is that, the "profile" (which is used by the service provider to describe the capabilities & service requestor to specify the request) forms an important part for the service discovery mechanism. Based on this, I have a couple of questions: -- 1.) Do we assume that the service requestor and the provider use the same ontology to describe the IOPE's ? 2.) If yes, then do we achieve "real" interoperability ? I think we are constraining ourselves as it is unrealistic for requestors & providers to have the same/shared ontologies. 3.) If no, can you give me an example of a service request & advertisement which uses different ontologies ? 4.) I believe the WSMO approach tries to address few things about mediation between ontologies. Should we do something like this for OWL-s too ? It might be possible that my questions are naive and infact may be wrong too. But, I will really appreciate some feedback on these issues. Regards, Jyoti.
Received on Friday, 28 January 2005 15:58:38 UTC