- From: Charlie Abela <abcharl@keyworld.net>
- Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2005 21:44:43 +0100
- To: "Public-Sws-Ig@W3. Org" <public-sws-ig@w3.org>
Hi, I've been away from this list for quite some time and am trying to catch up with some issues. One of my last emails was related to the Service Profile and I would like to re-latch with this issue here. I have been noting with interest the developments occurring in other SWS initiatives, such as WSMO and IRS II. Well one thing that I noted is the separation between the service capabilities and service goals. Though in the OWL-S profile there is a way to define both, at least to some extent, it is a bit unnatural to think of services by their IOPEs. Are there any problems with modifying the profile to reflect capabilities and goals and not just IOPEs? The idea I want to put forward is simple. From a user point of view it is, in my opinion, almost impossible to identify the IOPEs for a required service, at most, the user might be able to identify the category, taxonomy or classification. From an agent point of view it might be different, but I think that it's a mistake to reduce operations with Web Services to agent/service interactions, excluding the user from the loop, at least at the moment. Thus making the profile a bit more user friendly by adding some constructs that can help separate service capabilities from goals can be beneficial to an increase usage of the profile. Regards Charlie
Received on Monday, 24 January 2005 20:45:14 UTC