- From: Evren Sirin <evren@cs.umd.edu>
- Date: Sat, 04 Sep 2004 15:27:39 -0400
- To: Juergen Zimmer <jzimmer@ags.uni-sb.de>
- CC: public-sws-ig@w3.org
Hi Juergen, You are right about the bug. Since the expressions are written as literals, it is harder to validate them. And there are still some other problems in BravoAirProcess.owl that will be fixed shortly. Thanks for pointing this one out. Best, Evren Juergen Zimmer wrote: >Dear all, > >looking at version 1.1 of BravoAirProcess.owl I think there is a little >bug in line 143. >Should it be "&process;#TheClient" instead of "#TheClient" ? > > <swrlx:IndividualPropertyAtom> > <swrlx:propertyPredicate rdf:resource="#hasFlightItinerary"/> > <swrlx:argument1 rdf:resource="#TheClient"/> > ^^^^^^^^^^^ > <swrlx:argument2 rdf:resource="#PreferredFlightItinerary"/> > </swrlx:IndividualPropertyAtom> > >Cheers > Juergen > > > > > >
Received on Saturday, 4 September 2004 19:35:41 UTC