W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-sws-ig@w3.org > October 2004

Fw: Preconditions and effects in the Service Profile

From: csp <cspriese@gmx.de>
Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2004 23:54:14 +0200
Message-ID: <016201c4bbb1$5ba19c60$6ea3fea9@claus14>
To: <public-sws-ig@w3.org>

One remark for this thread of discussion:

When I read first the OWL1.1 specification, I was a little bit confused
becaus I couldn't
find the ServiceProfile "hasEffects" construct in the Profile.xml file.
Only a "hasResult" is persent in Profile.xml as the only meaningfull

Perhaps a replacement also in the OWL1.1 document, or at least a short hint
about the replacement would be of use

Claus P.

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Evren Sirin" <evren@cs.umd.edu>
To: "Klaus Leopold" <klaus@itec.uni-klu.ac.at>
Cc: <public-sws-ig@w3.org>
Sent: Thursday, October 14, 2004 4:42 PM
Subject: Re: Preconditions and effects in the Service Profile

> Klaus Leopold wrote:
>>I've already stated this question a couple of days ago but didn't get any
>>response: Is it possible to _reference_ OWL-S preconditions and effects in
>>the service profile?
> Yes, you can. Note that in OWL-S 1.1 effects are being defined as part of
> a Result description so you would reference the Result instance that is
> defined in the process model. Just specify the URI's for the conditions
> and results defined in process model and reference them in the profile
> description (same as referencing inputs and outputs). See this example in
> BravoAirProfile.owl where a result from the process is being used in the
> profile:
>   <profile:hasResult rdf:resource="&ba_process;#HaveSeatResult"/>
> Hope this helps,
> Evren
>>The preconditions and effects in the Service Profile are usually a subset
>>of the Process Model. So it seems convinient if one could reference it.
>>I hope that someone can help me with this issue.
Received on Tuesday, 26 October 2004 23:18:47 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:32:46 UTC