Re: xml:base in OWL-S files from Bijan Parsia on 2004-10-15 (public-sws-ig@w3.org from October 2004)

From: Bijan Parsia <bparsia@isr.umd.edu>
Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2004 22:36:24 -0400
To: 'public-sws-ig' <public-sws-ig@w3.org>
Message-Id: <01DCBC34-1E53-11D9-BAC3-000D93C1F7A6@isr.umd.edu>

On Oct 14, 2004, at 10:26 PM, Daniel Elenius wrote:

>
> So, can we conclude that hash is slightly wrong but harmless? ;)

No.

It's not in any way wrong. It doesn't lead to errors.

It is a bit misleading as most people don't know the three different 
resolution rules for relative URIs in RDF/XML (I'll add that the same 
document reference resolution rule in RDF/XML is different, IIRC, to 
the one in the URI spec. Ick :))

So, you might label it bad style.

Cheers,
Bijan Parsia.

Received on Friday, 15 October 2004 02:36:31 UTC