- From: Bijan Parsia <bparsia@isr.umd.edu>
- Date: Mon, 4 Oct 2004 21:55:41 -0400
- To: Robert Mark Bram <relaxedrob@optusnet.com.au>
- Cc: public-sws-ig@w3.org
On Oct 4, 2004, at 9:43 PM, Robert Mark Bram wrote: > Hi Bijan, > >>> Are there any examples of OWL-S in currently in use? I have found a >>> few OWL ontologies on SchemaWeb, and was hoping that some people >>> have started using them.. >>> http://www.schemaweb.info/schema/BrowseSchema.aspx >> >> Do you mean OWL-S or OWL? > > Definitely OWL-S - I found a few instances of OWL in SchemaWeb, but no > examples of OWL-S. > >>> Also, are there any tools for OWL-S developed yet? I saw some for >>> DAML+OIL on Dave Beckett's resource list: >>> http://www.ilrt.bristol.ac.uk/discovery/rdf/resources/ >> >> This seems like OWL. >> >> Both OWL-S and OWL are in use. One example of OWL is exactly OWL-S! > > I should have said that I was after tools to help build an OWL-S > description of a service. :) If you want to do it programmatically: http://www.mindswap.org/2004/owl-s/api/ (More toys, including validators, etc.: http://www.mindswap.org/2004/owl-s/) We had a "composer" tool which got a bit bitrotted. Work is recommencing on that. We will also have some sort of specific browsing/editing support in: http://www.mindswap.org/2004/SWOOP/ >> OWL-S is being used by, e.g., Fujistu (for their Task Computing >> project http://taskcomputing.org/). > > Thank you very much - I am looking at this one now.. Enjoy. Cheers, Bijan Parsia.
Received on Tuesday, 5 October 2004 01:55:48 UTC