- From: Daniel Elenius <daele@ida.liu.se>
- Date: Fri, 26 Nov 2004 10:25:43 -0800
- To: Drew McDermott <drew.mcdermott@yale.edu>, public-sws-ig@w3.org
Drew McDermott wrote: > I've attached a slightly revised version of the Owl-S surface-syntax > definition. It now includes syntax for more control constructs: > > split+join is written p1 |> p2 |> ... |>pK > split is written p1 |< p2 |< ... |< pK > anyord is written p1 |; p2 |; ... |; pK > if-then-else is written > if exp then pT else pF > > Suggestions for alternative notations are welcome. Maybe two vertical > bars to suggest parallelism more emphatically? ||; or |;| ? > > Also, the parser for the Lexiparse grammar formalism I use is now > available (as an "alpha" release) at > http://www.cs.yale.edu/homes/dvm/#software. You can use it to read > the files owl-s-syn.lisp and owl-s-rdf.lisp, then parse the surface > representation and convert it to Owl/RDF. > Cool. Do you have any code to parse OWL/RDF and turn it into surface syntax? /Daniel
Received on Friday, 26 November 2004 18:25:44 UTC