- From: Sebastian Brandt <sbrandt@I5.Informatik.RWTH-Aachen.de>
- Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2004 16:32:04 +0100
- To: OWL-S Mailing List <public-sws-ig@w3.org>
Dear OWL-S developers, reading the OWL-S document, I found a few places, where a wording appearently did not reflect the semantics, as I had understood them from the text. 5.1.1 Process * Preconditions and Effects [...] The _output_ describes the actual event: that the amount of money in the credit card account has been reduced. [...] In my opinion, this is just the difference between output and effect - the output is some information like the invoice, yet the reduction itself is the _effect_. 5.4 Composite Process Unordered [...] X = (Sequence a b) Y = (Sequence c d) Z = (Unordered _A_ _B_) [...] The example only makes sense, as far as I can see, if Z = (Unordered X Y) I hope you can find out whether I misunderstood, or your draft is incorrect in this matters. Yours, Sebastian Brandt -- Dipl.-Inform. Sebastian Brandt Lehrstuhl für Informatik V an der RWTH Aachen Tel: 0241 - 80 21 514 Email: sbrandt@Informatik.RWTH-Aachen.de
Received on Saturday, 27 March 2004 13:01:13 UTC