- From: Drew McDermott <drew.mcdermott@yale.edu>
- Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2004 15:57:53 -0500 (EST)
- To: public-sws-ig@w3.org
> > [Drew McDermott, i.e., I] > >The problem is how to make A communicate with the "???". Suppose A is > >an invocation of a named process with output parameter 'res'. Then we > >need a way to refer to the "res output of that occurrence of A." We > >introduce a tagging mechanism for that purpose: > > [Austin Tate] > Could we resolve some of these problems by allowing for a set of variables > at the outer scope of any OWL-S/SWSL process... i.e. we don't try to bury > all this down in the details of specific conditions, etc. A list of > variables in the outer scope of the whole OWL-S process (where'er a > compound or primitive one) would appear to be a simple mechanism that is > more familiar to those of us used to dealing with planning system operators > anyway. It's not clear to me what you're proposing. Can you give an example, or rework the OP's example? -- Drew -- -- Drew McDermott Yale Computer Science Department
Received on Tuesday, 9 March 2004 15:58:08 UTC