- From: Drew McDermott <drew.mcdermott@yale.edu>
- Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2004 15:57:53 -0500 (EST)
- To: public-sws-ig@w3.org
> > [Drew McDermott, i.e., I]
> >The problem is how to make A communicate with the "???". Suppose A is
> >an invocation of a named process with output parameter 'res'. Then we
> >need a way to refer to the "res output of that occurrence of A." We
> >introduce a tagging mechanism for that purpose:
>
> [Austin Tate]
> Could we resolve some of these problems by allowing for a set of variables
> at the outer scope of any OWL-S/SWSL process... i.e. we don't try to bury
> all this down in the details of specific conditions, etc. A list of
> variables in the outer scope of the whole OWL-S process (where'er a
> compound or primitive one) would appear to be a simple mechanism that is
> more familiar to those of us used to dealing with planning system operators
> anyway.
It's not clear to me what you're proposing. Can you give an example,
or rework the OP's example?
-- Drew
--
-- Drew McDermott
Yale Computer Science Department
Received on Tuesday, 9 March 2004 15:58:08 UTC