Re: OWL-S preconditions - practical issues

> > > [Donal Murtagh]

> > > However, there doesn't appear to be any consensus about how=20
> > bindings=20
> > > should be specified.
> > [Bijan Parsia]
> > There is, in broad detail. At least, we hashed it around a few times,=20
> > even on this list, I believe. There will be something. The basic=20
> > outlines are similar to PDDL. The exact syntax was still in the air=20
> > last I checked.
> [Donal]
> Any idea where I can find more details about this?
> 

We should be releasing a new draft of the technical overview with a
complete explanation any day now.  (We = I, unfortunately.)  I'll post
it on this mailing list as soon as I finish it.

-- 
                                             -- Drew McDermott
                                                Yale University CS Dept.

Received on Thursday, 24 June 2004 11:38:24 UTC