Re: [OWL-S] OEs in the 1.1 Profile from Austin Tate on 2004-06-21 (public-sws-ig@w3.org from June 2004)

From: Austin Tate <a.tate@ed.ac.uk>
Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2004 10:04:05 +0100
To: David Martin <martin@AI.SRI.COM>, public-sws-ig <public-sws-ig@w3.org>
Message-Id: <5.2.0.9.2.20040621100239.01a49e68@mail.inf.ed.ac.uk:993>

At 19:43 20/06/2004 -0700, David Martin wrote:
>Therefore, it seems better to me that we also use the new Result class to 
>express the OEs of Profile.   (That is, we eliminate hasEffect and 
>hasOutput and create profile:hasResult, which runs parallel to 
>process:hasResult.)  In this way, it'll be more straightforward to trace 
>the relationships between the OEs of Process and Profile, and reasoning 
>code that looks at the Results of a Process can also be used in looking at 
>the results of a profile.


This sounds like a good idea. I am all in favour of the profile simply 
being a more abstract version of the process model but only coverning 
aspects that relate to its outer envelope description.

Austin

Received on Monday, 21 June 2004 05:03:39 UTC