Re: Regarding the tools for OWL-S

Jun Shen wrote:

> First link should be:
> 
> http://www.daml.org/services/owl-s/tools.html

You're quite right.  Thanks for making the correction!

- David

> 
> Cheers
> Jun
> -----Original Message-----
> From: public-sws-ig-request@w3.org [mailto:public-sws-ig-request@w3.org] On
> Behalf Of David Martin
> Sent: Friday, June 18, 2004 4:01 PM
> To: Ola Wahlström
> Cc: public-sws-ig
> Subject: Re: Regarding the tools for OWL-S
> 
> 
> 
> Ola -
> 
> I have just added two new tools to this page:
>    www.daml.org/services/tools.html
> 
> In addition to those tools, there are also about 5 OWL-S tools listed here:
> 
>    http://projects.semwebcentral.org/
> 
> including the Protege OWL-S Editor that is currently under development 
> at SRI, in collaboration with Daniel Elenius of Linköping University.
> 
> Good luck with your paper.  Please feel free to post a link to your 
> paper when it is finished; I'm sure there are a number of readers who 
> will find it interesting.
> 
> Regards,
> David Martin
> 
> Ola Wahlström wrote:
> 
> 
>>HI!
>>
>>I'm writing a paper about OWL-S for the Darmstadt Univeristy in Germany and am
> 
> trying to evaluate the tools recomended on your web site. There are 5 tools
> under the given URL and I found all of them very 
> 
>>interesting (2 x converting/mapping tools, 2 x composers, and one 
>>match-maker). I haven't found any other tool, especially regarding
> 
> manipulation (i.e. creating, parsing, querying, and inferencing) of OWL-S/DAML-S
> modellings aru you relying on pure OWL tools for this purpose and if yes, then i
> would like to know, which one you're using.
> 
>>I would apprciate a quick answer if possible, deadline coming up =)
>>
>>Thanks
>>
>>
>>Regards
>>
>>Ola Wahlström
>>
> 
> 
> 

Received on Friday, 18 June 2004 02:41:00 UTC