- From: Terry Payne <trp@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
- Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2004 16:43:40 +0100
- To: David Martin <martin@ai.sri.com>
- Cc: public-sws-ig@w3.org
- Message-Id: <9BDCC072-BE19-11D8-AE20-000A95DA4396@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
This has my vote as well! I've attached a diagram that illustrates how processes, profiles and services are connected, and it is a bit of a tangled web... Terry
On 13 Jun 2004, at 16:57, Drew McDermott wrote: > > >> [David Martin] >> >> I'd like to collapse ProcessModel and Process, in Process.owl. I >> doubt >> if anyone will object to this, in principle, but I think it should be >> mentioned "for the record". It has been discussed, now and then, in >> the >> past. >> >> ProcessModel has always been a simple class which points to a Process >> and also to a "process control model". Of course, ProcessControlModel >> is just a placeholder; no one has ever done any work on it (that is, >> not >> in the context of OWL-S). (But note that I think there's some >> important >> work to be done in this area; it's just that it's not a near-term >> priority.) > > I never understood what a process-control model was supposed to be, so > I agree with your proposal. > > -- Drew > > > -- > -- Drew McDermott > Yale Computer Science Department > > _______________________________________________________________________ Terry R. Payne, PhD. | http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~trp/index.html AgentLink III Co-coordinator | AgentLink III - http://www.agentlink.org University of Southampton | Voice: +44(0)23 8059 8343 [Fax: 8059 2865] Southampton, SO17 1BJ, UK | Email: terry@acm.org / trp@ecs.soton.ac.uk
Attachments
- image/gif attachment: ServiceProfileProcess.gif
Received on Tuesday, 15 June 2004 02:57:15 UTC