RE: OWL-S in protege? from Collin on 2004-01-28 (public-sws-ig@w3.org from January 2004)

From: Collin <collin@seu.edu.cn>
Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2004 00:22:24 +0800
To: "Bijan Parsia" <bparsia@isr.umd.edu>, "Florian Probst" <f.probst@uni-muenster.de>
Cc: "OWL-S" <public-sws-ig@w3.org>
Message-ID: <CFEEJBOCFNLNPMBOLIFACEAEDBAA.collin@seu.edu.cn>

And there seems to have a trivial typo error in the 1.0 version of Process.owl. 

"rdfs:label" was written to be "rdf:label" in the comment for IOPE.  :-)

Cheers,
Collin

> -----Original Message-----
> From: public-sws-ig-request@w3.org 
> [mailto:public-sws-ig-request@w3.org]On Behalf Of 
> Bijan Parsia
> Sent: Wednesday, January 28, 2004 9:05 PM
> To: Florian Probst
> Cc: OWL-S
> Subject: Re: OWL-S in protege?
> 
> 
> 
> On Jan 27, 2004, at 9:59 AM, Florian Probst wrote:
> 
> > hi,
> > I am searching for reasons and explanations why 
> most of the OWL-S 
> > examples provided on the net can not be 
> validated with an OWL 
> > validator.
> 

[snip]

Received on Wednesday, 28 January 2004 11:24:02 UTC