- From: Monika Solanki <monika@dmu.ac.uk>
- Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2004 16:03:20 +0000
- To: public-sws-ig <public-sws-ig@frink.w3.org>
- Message-ID: <40080B48.4010403@dmu.ac.uk>
This condition could also be treated as a pre-condition for the login-process - I am wondering if this is really unconditional. The bank would allow me to login only if I am a registered user. So if the condition: validUser(UserID) is true only then the bank login process would be executed and the date and time would be recorded and considered as an effect, which actualkly makes it a Conditional effect. -Monika Sheila McIlraith wrote: >It is possible to have an unconditional effect. Off the top of my >head: > >E.g., Imagine that everytime you log onto your online banking system, >the web service records the date and time that you logged on. That's >an unconditional effect of executing the bank-login process. > > > >On Fri, 16 Jan 2004, Monika Solanki wrote: > > > >>It is possible to have unConditional output for a service, however is it >> possible to have "unConditional Effect". I am not sure about that If >>someone can provide me with an example, it will be great. >>[Please note: my definition of effects does not include knowledge effects] >> >>Conditions/Preconditions can be expressed as conjunctions of formulae >>(which cannot be directly expressed in existing SWRL), however I believe >>that conditional effects would be represented in the form of an >>implication, which can be represented in SWRL. >>Since we want to be as close to SWRL as possible, would be good to have >>a mix'n' match kind of representation within the process model i.e >>expressing C/PC in a flavoured version of SWRL and CE in pure SWRL. >> >>Thanks, >> >>Monika >> >> >> >> >>-- >>[To unsubscribe to this list send an email to "majdart@bbn.com" >>with the following text in the BODY of the message "unsubscribe daml-process"] >> >> >> >-- >[To unsubscribe to this list send an email to "majdart@bbn.com" >with the following text in the BODY of the message "unsubscribe daml-process"] > > >
Received on Friday, 16 January 2004 11:05:21 UTC