public-sws-ig@w3.org from January 2004 by date

Sunday, 1 February 2004

• Re: Gentle introduction to "Planning"? Sheila McIlraith
• Re: Gentle introduction to "Planning"? Bijan Parsia
• RE: Composition as planning Charlie Abela

Saturday, 31 January 2004

• Re: Composition as planning Dana Nau
• Re: Composition as planning Sheila McIlraith
• Gentle introduction to "Planning"? Graham Klyne
• Re: Composition as planning Austin Tate
• Composition as planning Charlie Abela

Thursday, 29 January 2004

• Re: OWL-S in protege? David Martin
• Re: [OWL-S]: Proposal for 3 new control constructs Bijan Parsia
• Re: [OWL-S]: Proposal for 3 new control constructs David Martin
• [OWL-S]: Proposal for 3 new control constructs David Martin

Wednesday, 28 January 2004

• RE: OWL-S in protege? Collin
• Re: OWL-S in protege? Bijan Parsia
• Re: OWL-S in protege? Bijan Parsia
• Re: Which OWL Species does OWL-S use? Bijan Parsia
• Re: OWL-S in protege? Sean Bechhofer

Tuesday, 27 January 2004

• OWL-S in protege? Florian Probst
• Which OWL Species does OWL-S use? Daniel Elenius
• Re: Abstract Core Ontology for SWSL Processes Austin Tate
• Re: Abstract Core Ontology for SWSL Processes Graham Klyne
• Re: Abstract Core Ontology for SWSL Processes pat hayes

Sunday, 25 January 2004

• Your Ship Has Come In! This Time You Are Not At The Airport! Will Smith

Monday, 26 January 2004

• Re: Abstract Core Ontology for SWSL Processes Graham Klyne

Sunday, 25 January 2004

• RE: Interoperability with DAML-S Ryusuke Masuoka
• RE: Abstract Core Ontology for SWSL Processes Ryusuke Masuoka
• Re: Abstract Core Ontology for SWSL Processes Austin Tate

Saturday, 24 January 2004

• Re: Abstract Core Ontology for SWSL Processes David Martin
• Interoperability with DAML-S Luca Tarrini

Friday, 23 January 2004

• Re: Parser C# Dan Brickley
• RE: Parser C# Danny Ayers
• Parser C# luca.tarrini@isti.cnr.it
• Re: Nonmonotonic rules Michael Kifer
• Re: Nonmonotonic rules Michael Kifer

Thursday, 22 January 2004

• Re: Nonmonotonic rules pat hayes
• Re: Nonmonotonic rules pat hayes
• Re: Nonmonotonic rules Jeff Lansing
• Re: Nonmonotonic rules Bijan Parsia

Wednesday, 21 January 2004

• Re: Nonmonotonic rules Michael Kifer
• Re: Nonmonotonic rules pat hayes
• Re: Nonmonotonic rules Michael Kifer
• Re: Nonmonotonic rules Bijan Parsia
• Re: Nonmonotonic rules Michael Kifer
• Re: Daml-s help Bijan Parsia

Tuesday, 20 January 2004

• Re: Abstract Core Ontology for SWSL Processes Jos De_Roo
• Please Join My Superb Yahoo Forums! Will Smith
• Re: Nonmonotonic rules pat hayes
• Daml-s help gerhecar@alumni.uv.es
• Damls advertising jimbo
• Re: Nonmonotonic rules Michael Kifer
• Re: Abstract Core Ontology for SWSL Processes pat hayes
• Re: Nonmonotonic rules pat hayes

Monday, 19 January 2004

• Re: Abstract Core Ontology for SWSL Processes Jos De_Roo
• Re: Abstract Core Ontology for SWSL Processes pat hayes
• [public-sws-ig] <none> jimbo

Sunday, 18 January 2004

• Re: Nonmonotonic rules Michael Kifer

Saturday, 17 January 2004

• Re: Nonmonotonic rules Stephen Pollei
• Re: Abstract Core Ontology for SWSL Processes Austin Tate
• Re: Abstract Core Ontology for SWSL Processes Austin Tate
• Re: [OWL-S] Process subClassOf IntervalEvent Austin Tate

Friday, 16 January 2004

• Re: Abstract Core Ontology for SWSL Processes pat hayes
• Re: Nonmonotonic rules pat hayes
• Re: [OWL-S] Process subClassOf IntervalEvent pat hayes
• Re: [Fwd: Re: UnConditionalEffect ????] Sheila McIlraith
• [Fwd: Re: UnConditionalEffect ????] Monika Solanki
• Re: UnConditionalEffect ???? Monika Solanki
• Re: [OWL-S] Process subClassOf IntervalEvent Austin Tate
• Re: [OWL-S] Process subClassOf IntervalEvent Bijan Parsia
• Re: FW: updated service model Austin Tate
• Abstract Core Ontology for SWSL Processes Austin Tate
• Re: [OWL-S] Process subClassOf IntervalEvent Austin Tate
• [OWL-S] Process subClassOf IntervalEvent Bijan Parsia
• Re: [OWL-S] Proposal for Making Progress on Process Modeling esp. Preconditons and Effects Michael Kifer
• Re: [OWL-S] Proposal for Making Progress on Process Modeling esp. Preconditons and Effects Michael Kifer
• Re: Nonmonotonic rules Michael Kifer
• Re: [OWL-S] Proposal for Making Progress on Process Modeling esp. Preconditons and Effects pat hayes

Thursday, 15 January 2004

• Re: Nonmonotonic rules pat hayes
• Re: [OWL-S] Proposal for Making Progress on Process Modeling esp. Preconditons and Effects Michael Kifer
• Re: Nonmonotonic rules pat hayes
• Re: Nonmonotonic rules Michael Kifer
• Re: Nonmonotonic rules Adrian Walker
• Nonmonotonic rules pat hayes
• Re: [OWL-S] Proposal for Making Progress on Process Modeling esp. Preconditons and Effects pat hayes
• Re: [OWL-S] Proposal for Making Progress on Process Modeling esp. Preconditons and Effects Bijan Parsia
• Re: [OWL-S] Proposal for Making Progress on Process Modeling esp. Preconditons and Effects Michael Kifer
• Re: [OWL-S] Proposal for Making Progress on Process Modeling esp. Preconditons and Effects Drew McDermott
• Re: DRS guide -- usage scenario ? Bijan Parsia
• Re: DRS guide -- usage scenario ? Drew McDermott
• Re: DRS guide -- usage scenario ? Drew McDermott
• Re: [OWL-S] Proposal for Making Progress on Process Modeling esp. Preconditons and Effects Sheila McIlraith
• Re: [OWL-S] Proposal for Making Progress on Process Modeling esp. Preconditons and Effects Bijan Parsia
• Re: [OWL-S] Proposal for Making Progress on Process Modeling esp. Preconditons and Effects Michael Kifer
• Re: DRS guide Bijan Parsia
• Re: DRS guide -- usage scenario ? Bijan Parsia

Wednesday, 14 January 2004

• Re: DRS guide -- usage scenario ? Adrian Walker

Tuesday, 13 January 2004

• RE: [OWL-S] Composition Templates Ryusuke Masuoka
• [OWL-S] Composition Templates Bijan Parsia
• DRS guide Drew McDermott

Monday, 12 January 2004

• Re: Referencing multiple WSDL files using OWL-S Mithun Sheshagiri
• Re: Use of rdfs resource in Service.owl Bijan Parsia
• Use of rdfs resource in Service.owl Gary Ng
• Does anyone have an example 'Service Request' for OWL-S 0.9 Fergus, Paul

Sunday, 11 January 2004

• Re: Question on OWL-S 1.0 Profile Mithun Sheshagiri
• Re: Question on OWL-S 1.0 Profile David Martin
• Re: Question on OWL-S 1.0 Profile Mithun Sheshagiri

Friday, 9 January 2004

• Re: first there was HTTP: .... then there was FTP: ... and now FI PA: Sandro Hawke
• RE: first there was HTTP: .... then there was FTP: ... and now FI PA: Dickinson, Ian J
• first there was HTTP: .... then there was FTP: ... and now FIPA: Tim Finin
• CFP: ECAI 2004 Workshop on Application of Semantic Web Technologies to Web Communities Rubén Lara
• OWL-S 1.0 release announcement David Martin

Thursday, 8 January 2004

• En:Question on OWL-S 1.0 Profile Alexandre Lins

Wednesday, 7 January 2004

• Why is wsdlOperation not a funtional property ? zhang lei
• RE: Referencing multiple WSDL files using OWL-S Fergus, Paul
• Job Opportunity - DERi-KM Ying Ding

Tuesday, 6 January 2004

• Re: Referencing multiple WSDL files using OWL-S mithun sheshagiri
• Referencing multiple WSDL files using OWL-S Fergus, Paul

Monday, 5 January 2004

• Re: [OWL-S] Who does what? pat hayes
• Re: [OWL-S] Who does what? Austin Tate
• Re: [OWL-S] Who does what? Drew McDermott
• RE: Cross-ontologies reasoning Charles White
• Re: [OWL-S] Who does what? David Martin

Friday, 2 January 2004

• [OWL-S] Proposal for Making Progress on Process Modeling esp. Preconditons and Effects Bijan Parsia

Last message date: Saturday, 31 January 2004 21:46:58 UTC