- From: Austin Tate <bat@aiai.ed.ac.uk>
- Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2004 20:53:10 +0000
- To: Drew McDermott <drew.mcdermott@yale.edu>, public-sws-ig@w3.org
- Cc: michael.gruninger@nist.gov
At 03:46 PM 11/02/2004 -0500, Drew McDermott wrote: >Note that there is always at most one definition of a process, and >there is almost always a small number of references to the process, >but the number of executions can be anything from 0 to ... some very >big possibly infinite number. Maybe NIST PSL's distinction of "activity" and "activity occurrence" gives us a key?
Received on Wednesday, 11 February 2004 16:31:14 UTC