- From: Manshan Lin <lmshill@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2004 22:35:10 +0800
- To: public-sws-ig@w3.org
If the resulting plan is in partial ordering manner,
it seems that sometimes we can directly use the constructs in OWL-S
process model to express the plan. For example:
OperationB<OperationA,
OperationC<OperationA,
OperationD<OperationB,
OperationD<OperationC,
OperationE<OperationC
Is there a need to make OWL-S support this feature?
If so, the current Qos reduction algorithm for composite web service[1]
seems infeasible to this situation and needs to be extended.
[1] Cardoso J., Miller J., Sheth A. and Arnold J., "Modeling Quality
of Service for Workflows and Web Service Processes", the International
Journal on Very Large Data Bases ( VLDBJ), May 2002.
--
Best regards!
Manshan Lin (林满山)
Email: lmshill@hotmail.com;lms-hill@21cn.com;lmshill@gmail.com
Affiliation: School of Computer Science and Engineering, the South
China University of Technology
Phone: (+86)13711287277
2004-12-22
----------------------
\ "
___0__/ |
/_ |
.__/ \_. |
Received on Wednesday, 22 December 2004 14:35:41 UTC