- From: Bijan Parsia <bparsia@isr.umd.edu>
- Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2004 23:20:00 +0900
- To: "Camara Melgosa, Javier" <JCAMARA@softwareag.es>
- Cc: public-sws-ig@w3.org
On Dec 17, 2004, at 11:07 PM, Camara Melgosa, Javier wrote: >>> Maybe you can be interested in "A Formal Comparison between WSMO and >>> OWL-S", in http://www.wsmo.org/2004/d4/d4.2/v0.1/ >> >> What makes it formal? > I do not know, but I did not put the title. I guess that more than > "formal" > it could be termed "systematic". Hmm. Comparing to examples (not use cases) doesn't quite seem systematic either. Whatever. It's a draft thing. >> It doesn't seem done either. > No, it has pending points and I guess the conclusions are outdated. It > is > mainly a mapping of the OWL-S examples to WSMO. Yep. Still, that can be useful. > Is it my impression, or the collaboration between the OWL-S and the > WSMO > teams is not as good as it could be? There's no collaboration twixt the *teams*, that I know of. The OWL-S coalition should be sorta wrapping up at a some point while WSMO is just getting started. That being said, there are of course points of contact. Indeed, at ISWC, there was a joint tutorial on WSMO and OWL-S that included a comparison session. > Are there any concrete activities (e.g. > at SWSI) to merge both initiatives in a single one? SWSI is doing its own thing at the moment, though OWL-S and WSMO people are participating. There are intentions that the community pull it altogether at some point, but right now I think there's some (healthy) diversifying. (OWL-S and WSMO and SWSI are no the only SWS efforts around!) Cheers, Bijan Parsia.
Received on Friday, 17 December 2004 14:20:23 UTC