- From: David Martin <martin@AI.SRI.COM>
- Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2004 14:03:33 -0700
- To: runepeter@online.no
- Cc: public-sws-ig@w3.org
Rune Peter Bjørnstad wrote: > Hi, > > > > I'm a bit puzzled by the has_process functional property of the OWL-S > Profile ontology. Why is it included when the Service ontology already > provides the association? It's a good point. Clearly the information is redundant. It was left in the profile ontology simply as a convenience. That is, a convenience for a matchmaker or tool (or human reader) that needs to navigate from a profile to the corresponding process model. But clearly it's a very minor convenience. By the way, in the Congo example the has_process > property refers to the Process Model and not a Process. Ah, you are right. That's a mistake, and I'll make sure it gets corrected in the next release. Thanks for finding it. Regards, David Martin > > > > Kind Regards, > > > > Rune Bjørnstad. > > >
Received on Wednesday, 14 April 2004 17:03:28 UTC