- From: Charlie Abela <abcharl@keyworld.net>
- Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2004 19:25:30 +0200
- To: "Public-Sws-Ig@W3. Org" <public-sws-ig@w3.org>
With all these ideas going on about preconditions and effects in OWL-S it is quite difficult to capture the general idea of how to define actual effects in WSs. I had the impression that an effect was something that will become true when the WS has executed but that also brought some changes to the world, but now there is talk of making use of post-condition instead. Actually from the readings that I found, these two words seem to be used interchangeably, depending on the research context, and thus I always presumed that they are somewhat synonymous. What are the views of the OWL-S ppl on this? Cause with all these somewhat radical changes being proposed it is quite difficult to get people to actually make use of these ontologies. Will there every be a stable set of OWL-S ontologies? Some time back there was a long discussion on the topic; I guess some clarification is now due. Regards Charlie
Received on Wednesday, 14 April 2004 13:25:44 UTC