- From: Paul Denning <pauld@mitre.org>
- Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2003 16:14:57 -0500
- To: "www-sws-ig" <public-sws-ig@w3.org>
At 01:08 PM 2003-11-19, Paul Denning wrote: >At 09:54 PM 2003-11-18, Max Voskob wrote: > >>Your comments and ideas are very welcome. > >Max, >I will speculate that you will meet resistance to the rdfBag idea as it >will make UDDI servers more complex to implement. > >Lacking the rdfBag, you can now use a categoryBag to point to an RDF or >OWL file. You would need a taxonomy tModel, unchecked, where the keyValue >is the URI of the RDF or OWL info. > >This seems more in keeping with the way things seem to work with UDDI >where it points to things outside of UDDI for details. > >This would imply that some engine would look though UDDI for all such use >of this "taxonomy" in a categoryBag, follow the keyValue to retrieve and >index the RDF/OWL, and provide a query and subscription/notification service. > >Paul > fyi, I created the taxonomy tModel in UBR [1] that I suggested above. [2] is a DAML-S description of a Housing Agent service, then (using [1]) a UDDI categoryBag would look like this: <categoryBag><keyedReference tModelKey="UUID:BF6770E0-1AC0-11D8-B8EF-000629DC0A53" keyName="Housing Agent" keyValue="http://www.daml.ri.cmu.edu/ont/TaskModeler/HousingAgent.daml" /> </categoryBag> [1] https://uddi.ibm.com/ubr/findtmodel?action=details&tmodelkey=UUID:BF6770E0-1AC0-11D8-B8EF-000629DC0A53 [2] http://www.daml.ri.cmu.edu/ont/TaskModeler/HousingAgent.daml Paul
Received on Wednesday, 19 November 2003 17:57:41 UTC