- From: Sheila McIlraith <sam@ksl.Stanford.EDU>
- Date: Sun, 9 Nov 2003 08:34:03 -0800 (PST)
- To: Monika Solanki <monika@dmu.ac.uk>
- Cc: David Martin <martin@ai.sri.com>, <public-sws-ig@w3.org>
Monika wrote > David wrote: > > > I also agree, except note that there are 2 proposals "on the table": > > > > I think Monika suggested this: > > > > Process - hasPrecondition - Precondition > > where Precondition is a subclass of Condition > > > > whereas Drew seems to be suggesting this: > > > > Process - hasPrecondition - Condition > > > > (with no Precondition class anywhere). > > I think we should retain the Precondition class and the hasPrecondition > property. This is because, although Precondition is effectively a > Condition, however it is a "special" kind of Condition. In the process > model, Condition is a general thing, which is also used for > Conditional Effects and Conditional Outputs. I agree. We may want to syntactically restrict the types of preconditions we have. This affords us that flexibility. Sheila
Received on Sunday, 9 November 2003 11:34:15 UTC