public-sws-ig@w3.org from November 2003 by date

Tuesday, 25 November 2003

• Fwd: Semantics and choreography Steve Ross-Talbot
• Semantics and choreography Steve Ross-Talbot
• Re: UDDI and semantics: CMU OWL-S/UDDI Mapping Jeff Lansing

Friday, 21 November 2003

• Re: UDDI and semantics: CMU OWL-S/UDDI Mapping Paul Denning
• DAML-S v1.0 - syntax, semantics and corectness Ion Constantinescu

Thursday, 20 November 2003

• Re: Broken Layering (was Re: What protocols are in scope?) Paul Denning
• Re: Broken Layering (was Re: What protocols are in scope?) Geoff Arnold
• Re: Broken Layering (was Re: What protocols are in scope?) Mark Baker
• Re: UDDI and semantics: CMU OWL-S/UDDI Mapping Massimo Paolucci
• IPsmarx Technologies Inc. Canada IPsmarx Technologies
• Re: Question on grounding! Drew McDermott
• Introduction - Dave Lewis Dave Lewis

Wednesday, 19 November 2003

• Re: UDDI and semantics Jeff Lansing
• Re: UDDI and semantics Paul Denning
• Re: UDDI and semantics Max Voskob
• Re: UDDI and semantics Max Voskob
• RE: UDDI and semantics Stephane Fellah
• Re: UDDI and semantics Farrukh Najmi
• RE: UDDI and semantics Stephane Fellah
• Re: UDDI and semantics Paul Denning
• RE: UDDI and semantics Paul Denning
• Broken Layering (was Re: What protocols are in scope?) Paul Denning
• Introduction - Ion Constantinescu Ion Constantinescu
• RE: UDDI and semantics Stephane Fellah
• Re: UDDI and semantics Jeff Lansing
• UDDI and semantics Max Voskob
• BPEL2DAMLS available online Jun Shen

Monday, 17 November 2003

• Re: Question on grounding! Mithun Sheshagiri

Tuesday, 11 November 2003

• Re: Attempt to use Owl rule language to express preconditions in Congo David Martin
• Re: Attempt to use Owl rule language to express preconditions in Congo Drew McDermott
• Re: Attempt to use Owl rule language to express preconditions in Congo Monika Solanki
• Re: Attempt to use Owl rule language to express preconditions in Congo Drew McDermott
• Introduction Francis McCabe
• Re: What protocols are in scope? Mark Baker
• Re: What protocols are in scope? Geoff Arnold
• What protocols are in scope? Mark Baker
• Re: Introduction - Mark Baker Geoff Arnold
• Re: [OWL-S] Re: the precondition property in OWL-S 1.0 Austin Tate
• [OWL-S] Re: the precondition property in OWL-S 1.0 Bijan Parsia
• Re: the precondition property in OWL-S 1.0 Austin Tate
• Re: the precondition property in OWL-S 1.0 Austin Tate
• Introduction - Thanassis Tiropanis Thanassis Tiropanis
• Re: Attempt to use Owl rule language to express preconditions in Congo David Martin
• Re: Attempt to use Owl rule language to express preconditions in Congo Drew McDermott
• Introduction - Mark Baker Mark Baker

Monday, 10 November 2003

• Re: the precondition property in OWL-S 1.0 Drew McDermott
• Re: the precondition property in OWL-S 1.0 Drew McDermott
• Expressing equivalence Monika Solanki
• Re: Attempt to use Owl rule language to express preconditions in Congo David Martin
• Introduction - Drew McDermott Drew McDermott
• Re: Attempt to use Owl rule language to express preconditions in Congo David Martin
• Re: the precondition property in OWL-S 1.0 Drew McDermott
• Introduction - Luca Tarrini Luca Tarrini
• Re: OWL Rule language Monika Solanki
• Re: OWL Rule language Ian Horrocks
• Re: OWL Rule language Monika Solanki
• Introduction - Mario Jeckle Mario Jeckle
• Introduction - Geoff Arnold Geoff Arnold
• Introduction - Ryusuke Masuoka Ryusuke Masuoka

Sunday, 9 November 2003

• Introduction - Jong-Hong Jeon hollobit@etri.re.kr
• Introduction - Jim Hendler Jim Hendler
• Re: OWL Rule language Ian Horrocks
• Introduction - Ian Horrocks Ian Horrocks
• Re: the precondition property in OWL-S 1.0 Sheila McIlraith
• Re: the precondition property in OWL-S 1.0 Austin Tate
• Re: the precondition property in OWL-S 1.0 Austin Tate
• Re: the precondition property in OWL-S 1.0 Austin Tate
• Re: the precondition property in OWL-S 1.0 Monika Solanki
• Re: the precondition property in OWL-S 1.0 Bijan Parsia
• Re: the precondition property in OWL-S 1.0 Drew McDermott
• Re: the precondition property in OWL-S 1.0 Drew McDermott
• Re: the precondition property in OWL-S 1.0 Yuzhong Qu

Saturday, 8 November 2003

• Re: the precondition property in OWL-S 1.0 Bijan Parsia
• RE: the precondition property in OWL-S 1.0 Huhns, Michael
• Re: the precondition property in OWL-S 1.0 Monika Solanki
• RE: the precondition property in OWL-S 1.0 Huhns, Michael
• Re: the precondition property in OWL-S 1.0 Monika Solanki
• Re: the precondition property in OWL-S 1.0 David Martin

Friday, 7 November 2003

• Introduction - Stephane Fellah Stephane Fellah
• Re: OWL Rule language Monika Solanki
• Introduction - Mark Burstein Mark Burstein
• Introduction - David De Roure David De Roure
• Introduction - Austin Tate Austin Tate
• Welcome to the Semantic Web Services Interest Group! Carine Bournez

Thursday, 6 November 2003

• SWSL Requirements Document - Enactment Section Austin Tate
• DAML-S/OWL-S, SWSI content MOVING to public-sws-ig David Martin
• DAML-S v1.0 - syntax, semantics and corectness Ion Constantinescu

Wednesday, 5 November 2003

• Question on grounding Sakda Chaiworawitkul

Last message date: Tuesday, 25 November 2003 15:28:38 UTC