- From: Austin Tate <a.tate@ed.ac.uk>
- Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2003 11:22:40 +0000
- To: Drew McDermott <drew.mcdermott@yale.edu>, public-sws-ig@w3.org
At 07:30 PM 19/12/2003 -0500, Drew McDermott wrote: > (1) Make "who does what" more explicit in OWL-S process models, by > relying on "participant", and adding additional, related, constructs as > needed to spell it out. > >Attractive idea, but it will ultimately disappoint you. can you be more specific Drew... separating a description of a process/activity from a participant centric view sound very appealing to me... and is what we usually do when mapping business and other processes. We describe the process and then say who/what can perform various things. Indeed when dynamically assigning participants/performers this would seem to be essential. Austin
Received on Saturday, 20 December 2003 06:30:03 UTC