Re: preparing Next stakeholder survey, charter and general admin

Milton

I presume the linkedin purpose objectives procedures etc are the same as
the group's as a whole
(so that's what I would work on - because what we have so far in terms of
charter is still just a kernel, then propagate whatever we come up across
all our media platforms)

However if people feel that linkedin would  have a different purpose or
need a different strategy, surely thats just a matter of scoping explicitly

P


On Tue, Aug 5, 2014 at 10:50 PM, ProjectParadigm-ICT-Program <
metadataportals@yahoo.com> wrote:

> Can we to adhere to some consensus and decision-making procedures and
> collectively brainstorm to define what the LinkedIn group should do in
> terms of objectives, information dissemination, interaction etc. since
> outsiders could be allowed to join through a moderator thus greatly
> enhancing our outreach.
>
> Exposure leads to more interests and possibly more active members in our
> W3C Community Group.
>
> Just thinking out aloud.
>
> Milton Ponson
> GSM: +297 747 8280
> PO Box 1154, Oranjestad
> Aruba, Dutch Caribbean
> Project Paradigm: A structured approach to bringing the tools for
> sustainable development to all stakeholders worldwide by creating ICT
> tools for NGOs worldwide and: providing online access to web sites and
> repositories of data and information for sustainable development
>
> This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended
> solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed.
> If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager.
> This message contains confidential information and is intended only for the
> individual named. If you are not the named addressee you should not
> disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail.
>
>
>   On Sunday, August 3, 2014 4:44 AM, ProjectParadigm-ICT-Program <
> metadataportals@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>
> I agree.
>
> Milton Ponson
> GSM: +297 747 8280
> PO Box 1154, Oranjestad
> Aruba, Dutch Caribbean
> Project Paradigm: A structured approach to bringing the tools for
> sustainable development to all stakeholders worldwide by creating ICT
> tools for NGOs worldwide and: providing online access to web sites and
> repositories of data and information for sustainable development
>
> This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended
> solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed.
> If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager.
> This message contains confidential information and is intended only for the
> individual named. If you are not the named addressee you should not
> disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail.
>
>
>   On Tuesday, July 29, 2014 2:49 AM, Paola Di Maio <paola.dimaio@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>
> Bernard
>
> I have posted on my linked in status the link to the new group, as you
> suggest
>
> - generally I am connected to Linkedin to people I have met in person, and
> with whom there is a minimal degree of  professional trust, the majority of
> this group members I have not (yet) met but now connected to you also-
>
> Personally, I dont consider buzz desirable per se, not without something
> solid to buzz about (as they say, sizzle vs steak :-)
>
> we should aim to identify what needs to be done then try to take some
> steps toward what needs to be done, THEN we can buzz about it like happy
> bees :-)
>
> have been thinking how to stimulate activities further
> throw a party? give away prizes?  a loyalty scheme? :-)
>
> I think we are dong fine, growing organically and creating the opportunity
> for developments to take place, then letting nature follow its course, til
> things
> happen at their own pace :-)
>
> look forward
>
> P
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 9:38 PM, Bernard Chabot <iplumb3r@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> Hello Paola,
>
> I do not know if you are "LinkedIn" connected with all swisig group member
> ...
> ... but one efficient thing could be to make a announcement of the
> creation of this group directly from your LinkedIn account.
> Thus, everybody connected to you in LinkedIn could share this news in its
> own network ...
> ... and this could make some little buzz around us
>
> Cheers,
>
> Bernard
>
>
>
> On Sat, Jul 26, 2014 at 2:55 PM, Paola Di Maio <paola.dimaio@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> Thanks a lot Marco
>
> Let's join!!
>
> pdm
>
>
> On Sat, Jul 26, 2014 at 6:25 PM, Marco Neumann <marco.neumann@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> I have created the LinkedIn Group here:
>
> https://www.linkedin.com/groups?home=&gid=8142655
>
> On Sat, Jul 26, 2014 at 8:39 AM, Marco Neumann <marco.neumann@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > I have created the LinkedIn Group here.
> >
> >
> > On Sat, Jul 26, 2014 at 8:02 AM, Paola Di Maio <paola.dimaio@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >> Marco
> >>
> >> two quicks
> >>
> >> - members are encouraged to co- lead by taking initiative
> >> if you think something is beneficial, please do it  :-)
> >> (I have limited capacity, will consider your suggestion when I have a
> >> mo)
> >> -  increasing exposure is good, but, how to increase the
> activity/exchanges
> >> withing
> >> the group? do you think a linkedin group and g+ will make us more
> >> productive/collaborative?
> >>
> >> I ll work on the next round of inputs from members soon, hoping that
> people
> >> will commit
> >> to at least something :-)
> >>
> >> I take the opportunity to thank again Roberto, Martin, Heiko and other
> for
> >> taking the lead on respective actions, and hope others will follow
> >>
> >> cheers
> >>
> >> PDM
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 8:05 PM, Marco Neumann <marco.neumann@gmail.com
> >
> >> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Yes I would think that it adds value as it increases visibility and
> >>> allows people to connect, same would apply to reference on g+ .
> >>>
> >>> On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 10:18 AM, Paola Di Maio <
> paola.dimaio@gmail.com>
> >>> wrote:
> >>> > Marco
> >>> > hadnt thought about a linked in group, because havent thought about
> how
> >>> > it
> >>> > can add value to the community (not many posts here, would people
> post
> >>> > there?)
> >>> > - members can add affiliation to their portfolios  without the
> linnked
> >>> > in
> >>> > group, no?
> >>> >
> >>> > but if useful we can quickly launch one, and if its not used
> >>> > we can always delete it later.
> >>> >
> >>> > I ll do it when I have a mo, if nobody has done it by then
> >>> > cheers
> >>> > P
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>> > On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 12:11 PM, Marco Neumann
> >>> > <marco.neumann@gmail.com>
> >>> > wrote:
> >>> >>
> >>> >> did you already create a "W3C Semantic Web Interfaces Community"
> >>> >> LinkedIn
> >>> >> group?
> >>> >>
> >>> >> it would help raise visibility and allows members to add this
> >>> >> affiliation to their portfolio.
> >>> >>
> >>> >> Marco
> >>> >>
> >>> >> On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 12:54 AM, Paola Di Maio
> >>> >> <paola.dimaio@gmail.com>
> >>> >> wrote:
> >>> >> > 41 members, mostly quiet, but active in the background
> >>> >> > (doing things without much discussion)
> >>> >> >
> >>> >> > not bad, but what can we create together?
> >>> >> >
> >>> >> > I was trying to make the stakeholder survey mandatory for everyone
> >>> >> > who
> >>> >> > joins, but
> >>> >> > we do not have a way to implement this yet, so please kindly take
> a
> >>> >> > minute
> >>> >> > to give
> >>> >> > input when joining, or whenever you have a minute
> >>> >> >
> >>> >> > Here is the (old) form where members can  still give input
> >>> >> >
> >>> >> > Input your preferences on the online form
> >>> >> >
> >>> >> >
> >>> >> >
> >>> >> >
> https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/viewform?formkey=dDRZYXRvcUlEVjlIRjJHcTBpV3poeWc6MQ#gid=0
> >>> >> >
> >>> >> >
> >>> >> > responses
> >>> >> >
> >>> >> >
> >>> >> >
> >>> >> >
> https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/lv?key=0ApXeDqbLLqHSdDRZYXRvcUlEVjlIRjJHcTBpV3poeWc&rm=full#gid=0
> >>> >> >
> >>> >> > NEXT SURVEY
> >>> >> > - we could drill a bit more into the group to find out things like
> >>> >> >
> >>> >> > geographical location of members (to support the planning of
> >>> >> > face to face activities) and field of practice (academia, industry
> >>> >> > etc)
> >>> >> >
> >>> >> > what else should be useful to know about the group's members?
> >>> >> > please suggest any questions you may have under this thread, so
> that
> >>> >> > they
> >>> >> > can be included in the survey-
> >>> >> >
> >>> >> > Also,  please help to shape a charter. Should we aim to have a
> nice
> >>> >> > workable
> >>> >> > collectively shaped charter
> >>> >> > before the end of the year?
> >>> >> >
> >>> >> > At the moment we have a stub
> >>> >> > http://www.w3.org/community/swisig/wiki/Main_Page
> >>> >> >
> >>> >> >
> >>> >> > someone suggested the charter should contain the following
> headings
> >>> >> >
> >>> >> > 1. community goals
> >>> >> > 2. proposed activities/timeframes
> >>> >> > 3. governance/rules
> >>> >> >
> >>> >> > anything else?
> >>> >> >
> >>> >> > will send another link to 2014 survey with additional
> >>> >> > questions/soliciting
> >>> >> > inputs for the charter soon
> >>> >> >
> >>> >> > please start thinking
> >>> >> >
> >>> >> > cheerios
> >>> >> >
> >>> >> > PDM
> >>> >> >
> >>> >> >
> >>> >> >
> >>> >> >
> >>> >> >
> >>> >> >
> >>> >> >
> >>> >> >
> >>> >>
> >>> >>
> >>> >>
> >>> >> --
> >>> >>
> >>> >>
> >>> >> ---
> >>> >> Marco Neumann
> >>> >> KONA
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> ---
> >>> Marco Neumann
> >>> KONA
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> >
> >
> > ---
> > Marco Neumann
> > KONA
>
>
>
> --
>
>
> ---
> Marco Neumann
> KONA
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>