- From: Evan Prodromou <evan@prodromou.name>
- Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2025 10:20:28 -0400
- To: "public-swicg@w3.org" <public-swicg@w3.org>
I want to start a conversation about task-force report-outs. We do regular task-force report-outs at our CG meetings; our next meeting is on Friday. Usually these report-outs are voluntary and kind of ad-hoc. I have to wonder, though, if a task force that hasn't made any progress during a calendar month is actively working on its goal. If there's nothing for a task force to report, have they actually made progress? Would raising our expectations for task-force reports from voluntary to sort-of mandatory increase task force activity? Does having a monthly reporting requirement incentivize more activity? We have about a dozen active task forces; synchronous report-outs during the CG meeting would probably take the whole meeting. Could we also have an async process for written progress reports -- maybe on the mailing list or on the Fediverse? Evan
Received on Tuesday, 30 September 2025 14:20:32 UTC