- From: Johannes Ernst <johannes.ernst@dazzlelabs.net>
- Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2025 10:06:20 -0700
- To: Melvin Carvalho <melvincarvalho@gmail.com>
- Cc: public-swicg@w3.org
Received on Wednesday, 17 September 2025 17:06:37 UTC
> On Sep 16, 2025, at 22:25, Melvin Carvalho <melvincarvalho@gmail.com> wrote: > > út 16. 9. 2025 v 22:32 odesílatel Johannes Ernst <johannes.ernst@dazzlelabs.net <mailto:johannes.ernst@dazzlelabs.net>> napsal: >> During registration for FediForum (which is coming up again, by the way!) we are asking people for their social web handles: >> >> Here is a selection of what they give us when they probably mean ActivityPub >> >> @foo@bar >> AP: @foo@bar >> https://bar/@foo >> foo@bar >> foo (???) >> acct:foo@bar >> >> Is it time to define a canonical version? > > The canonical identifier is the Uniform Resource Identifier (URI) or Actor URI, as per the ActivityPub spec On the protocol level, sure. But I’m talking about the user level. Cheers, Johannes.
Received on Wednesday, 17 September 2025 17:06:37 UTC