[CfC] Type property in example 102

Issue 444 in the Activity Streams 2.0 GitHub repository describes an 
unclear example in the Activity Vocabulary document, wherein a `Link` 
object does not have the `type: "Link"` property defined:

https://github.com/w3c/activitystreams/issues/444

To fix this problem, I've made a PR to add an erratum that adds this 
property to the example code:

https://github.com/w3c/activitystreams/pull/585

We usually handle approval of errata in our synchronous meetings, which 
takes time and focus away from other topics that require more immediate 
presence and conversation. In speaking with the chairs and others in the 
issue triage meeting, we think that handling this task through the CFC 
decision-making process will be more efficient.

So, I am seeking consensus to add this erratum to our errata document 
for Activity Streams 2.0. Please reply either to the GitHub issue or 
here on the mailing within 14 days of this message.

Evan

Received on Friday, 23 May 2025 16:42:52 UTC