- From: Ted Han <ted@knowtheory.net>
- Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2025 13:54:37 -0800
- To: "Emelia S." <emelia@brandedcode.com>
- Cc: public-swicg@w3c.org, Evan Prodromou <evan@prodromou.name>
- Message-ID: <CALhFOH=HfAOLhUF6AVVWTYOWW_OAtw-9SFsqzpKCoxcO+WGwjQ@mail.gmail.com>
Can I also suggest that folks take a look at the existing ClaimReview standard that search engines and other platforms ingest and was built with orgs in the fact checker community like IFCN and the Duke Reporter’s Lab. - https://schema.org/ClaimReview - https://www.claimreviewproject.com/user-guide On Jan 13, 2025 at 08:21:54, Emelia S. <emelia@brandedcode.com> wrote: > This is already something on the list of things that the ActivityPub Trust > & Safety Taskforce is working on: > > [image: 4.png] > > Idea: Annotations / Labeling of content · Issue #4 · > swicg/activitypub-trust-and-safety > <https://github.com/swicg/activitypub-trust-and-safety/issues/4> > github.com > <https://github.com/swicg/activitypub-trust-and-safety/issues/4> > <https://github.com/swicg/activitypub-trust-and-safety/issues/4> > > The Web Annotations model could work, but the discovery of annotations > that exist is the hardest part, I've started solving that in > https://github.com/ThisIsMissEm/annotations-service where I use the > sha256 hash of the Object ID as the annotation collection ID, giving a very > simple way to fetch all annotations for a given object. > > I do want to investigate what an Annotate activity would look like, but I > suspect this would just be an announcement of sorts "hey, there's this web > annotation over here for this target" > > Yours, > Emelia > > On 13 Jan 2025, at 04:23, Evan Prodromou <evan@prodromou.name> wrote: > > We don't have an easy way for remote actors to annotate content on the > Fediverse. > > The biggest use case for this is to have permissionless fact-checking or > community notes. A fact-checking service could annotate a remote content > object like a Note or a Video with additional fact-checking information, > and compliant clients or servers could show the fact-checking information > when showing the Note. > > I think there are some tricky parts to this structure, which I believe > suggests that we should start working on it. > > Evan > > > >
Attachments
- image/png attachment: 4.png
Received on Wednesday, 22 January 2025 21:54:45 UTC