Re: ActivityPub and AI bots?

Wait for it wait for it the hidden powers that be who look after all the
federated instances are going to have to lock down responding to new
servers and users coming online or have to respond to a whole new wave of
bot behaviour. I for one will probably not be connecting to ActivityPub on
my system if this comes into being and there's just too much chaotic non
human traffic. It will be a white list world.

On Sat, 1 Feb 2025, 20:14 Melvin Carvalho, <melvincarvalho@gmail.com> wrote:

>
>
> so 1. 2. 2025 v 20:09 odesílatel info@hauschel.de <info@hauschel.de>
> napsal:
>
>> There was currently a talk about it @ fosdem
>>
>> <
>> https://fosdem.org/2025/schedule/event/fosdem-2025-5601-build-your-own-timeline-algorithm/
>> >
>>
>
> Neat! I’m also working on agent-based open protocols with around 20 folks
> in the Solid + webagents community groups.
>
> Our “Agentic Linked Data” should mostly work with AP out of the box.
>
> The big question is whether an ActivityPub Actor can just be an Agent—like
> in Solid’s FOAF. We’re also playing with nostr (designed for agents), and
> noting Jack’s new Goose project. In nostr its modeled a bit differently and
> in your profile you have bot = true/false.
>
> My hunch: 2025 is the year of Agentic, and we’re keen on standards-based
> approaches. Probably Solid first, then generic Linked Data, then
> AP—depending on time and helpers.
>
>
>>
>>
>>
>> Am 1. Februar 2025 18:56:50 MEZ schrieb Bob Wyman <bob@wyman.us>:
>>
>>> Has anyone yet used the API's of Llama, or something else, to link
>>> ActivityPub to AI? Is there a bot that can receive and answer user queries
>>> via ActivityPub?
>>>
>>> bob wyman
>>>
>>> -- Sent from /e/OS Mail.
>>
>